The construction industry has written an open letter to the prime minister Sir Keir Starmercalling for a rethink on proposed apprenticeship reforms that they describe as a ‘race to the bottom’.
More than 20 trade bodies including the Federation of Master Builders have signed a letter outlining concerns about reducing average apprentice ship times to eight months. They claim it could jeopardise the government’s target to build 1.5m new homes by 2029.
British Woodworking Federation, BWF, chief executive Helen Hewitt said: “You need to know apprentices have been trained to correctly install life-saving critical products such as a staircase so that it doesn’t fall down.”
She said the building industry was committed to improving skills, knowledge, experience and behaviors to avoid another Grenfell fire tragedy.
Ms Hewitt explained that joinery apprentices, for example, would typically take 15 months to qualify for level 2 and would be tested on 70 key competencies. Under the reforms apprenticeships would be reduced to just eight months with a sampling of 30 to 40 per cent of the key competencies.
“This is insufficient for an individual studying carpentry and joinery. For example, there are lots of different carpentry joints from dovetail to t-tail but if the assessors only look at competency for one then this is not enough.”
Sample testing would create inconsistencies
The reforms want each assessment organisation to select a smaller sample of criteria to assess and use that to infer the apprentices’ overall competence.
“It is likely any form of sampling will create inconsistency across different assessment providers and stimulate a race to the bottom, as providers are incentivised to create lighter touch assessments to secure better pass rates and cost efficiencies,” said Ms Hewitt.
She said that when the new assessment plan is released, it would not reflect employer and industry needs and this would undermine employer confidence resulting in fewer apprentices being taken on.
The National Federation of Builders, NFB, which also signed the open letter, agreed that the proposals would mean SMEs would only know if a person was sufficiently skilled until they were hired.
NFB policy and market insight head Rico Wojtulewicz said: “The quality of the assessment is paramount to support a learner’s career progress. In terms of competency, we won’t understand how ready new apprentices are until they are in the broader supply chain.”
Brokers Hank Zarihs Associates, who specialise in organising development finance, said it was feared that SME developers would shy away from the risk of taking on apprentices.
Ms HewittsaidSkills England had rushed the consultationwhich started in late June and finished before the end of August ignoring industry feedback.
“An effective consultation process should allow for formal discussion and the opportunity for all impacted stakeholders to provide feedback,” said Ms Hewitt.
She added that BWF’s feedback had been sidelineddespite the organisation taking part as a pilot to test the new proposals.
A spokesperson for the education department denied that apprenticeships would be reduced to an average of eight months and said this would only apply to individuals with prior work experience.
They were unable to comment on sample testing competencies as they said they needed more time to respond.
LinkedIn Question: How confident would you be about taking on an apprentice whose key competencies have been sample tested?

