Housebuilders are calling for flexibility over tenures as financially strapped housing associations are increasingly unable to buy the ‘affordable homes’ element of a development.
The Home Builders Federation, HBF, wants local authorities to engage constructively with renegotiations when a registered provider cannot be secured.
HBF chief executive Neil Jefferson said: “Against rising affordability pressures and increasing numbers of families living in temporary accommodation, it cannot be that affordable homes are left standing empty.”
About 900 completed affordable homes are empty due to a lack of commitment from social housing providers to take them, according to HBF analysis of data from a freedom of information request.
A further8,500 affordable homes due to be built in the next 12 months are at risk, as social housing providers pull back from taking on new Section 106 contracts.
“As it stands, housing associations are unable to bid and private buyers unable to buy, leaving the housing outlook increasingly uncertain,” said Mr Jefferson.
The housing industry is pushing for a ‘cascade’ system to be introduced when negotiating Section 106 agreements with councils.
Alternative tenures would enable homes to be built
So, if there are no bids from registered providers, then alternative tenures could be adopted such as affordable rents, shared ownership or discounted market sale.
“Such a step would help ensure that homes continue to be delivered, while providing developers with the assurance that if a registered provider cannot be secured, the affordable housing units can be converted to an alternative tenure or, as a last resort, replaced with a financial contribution to the local planning authority,” said Mr Jefferson.
In the last three years, at least 700 housing developments are estimated to have been delayed due to a lack of commitment from social housing providers.
“Right now, an estimated 100,000 private units are stalled, which not only threatens the supply of much-needed homes but also risks the livelihoods of regional businesses and hardworking tradespeople up and down the country,” said Mr Jefferson.
Earlier this summer, more than 90 HBF members wrote to housing minister Matthew Pennycook, urging government intervention.
Particularly affected are small and medium home builders with capital tied up in uncontracted units, often funded by loans, as this jeopardises their cashflow and investment in future phases or projects.
Brokers Hank Zarihs Associates said without a contracted 106 deal, small builders could struggle to secure development finance to start the project.
Housebuilders were responsible for 45 per cent of the 46,000 affordable homes delivered last year.
The National Federation of Builders, NFB, added that affordable homes are sold below the market rate, with smaller developers generally selling at a loss. Developers are liable for council tax on the empty affordable homes with this doubling in the second year.
NFB policy and market insight head Rico Wojtulewicz said: “Local authorities are not working with developers to understand what is going wrong, they are simply seeking revenue.”
He added that some local planning authorities insist on a pre-occupation condition when the affordable homes must be built before those for sale on the open market plus a completion notice.
“The government knows there’s a problem because they set up an affordable home clearing service run by Homes England last year.”
The system allows housebuilders to list affordable homes they are unable to sell for housing associations and local authorities to view and potentially buy.
Mr Wojtulewicz added that several NFB members had applied to register for the service, but no one had come back to them.
A housing department spokesperson said they were looking into the issue and highlighted that £39bn was pledged in June’s spending review to social housing over the next decade. The funding will run from 2026-27 for a decade and is aimed at giving registered providers certainty over capital funding.
LinkedIn Question: Should Homes England offer grant funding for ‘affordable homes’ if a housing association or council bid fails to materialise?